Early Access Feedback - lvl 95 and I am done! - Forum

93 was my highest, now it's just 90 and can clear all content so being 100 is pointless, no reward for it why bother? lol	Posté par Sydneydonza#3078 le 17 mars 2025 20:14:28 Citer ce post
What do you think you're going to get at level 100? There is nothing. You hardly gain any power from your last few levels. And once you hit it? No more progress. Then what do you do? Find something else to complain about I guess. You guys are beyond hopelessly addicted if you even got to 95.	Posté par b_ko#7756 le 17 mars 2025 21:25:18 Citer ce post
" InterfaceBoy#4817 a écrit : sorry no. if players can reach Lv100 easily, they just quit playing, which will reduce the daily active number, then GGG can't show a good report to Tencent. Usually, exponential difficulty in endgame is there to hide lack of content. Food for thought	Posté par Seonora#7837 le 18 mars 2025 01:22:59 Citer ce post
" Originalx9#7672 a écrit : Hard disagree. It doesn't even take half as many hours to get to 100 here as it did to get to 99 in diablo 2 pre terror zones....and a LOT of people were happy with that. Plus, ARPG's learned the hard way that levels are smart to basically allow to never cap, that way there's at least almost always something to chase. Every ARPG that added a max level you get to real fast ended up in a vicious cycle of players doing dungeons, to get more loot, to do dungeons, to get more loot, to do dungeons, to get more loot....there was never a secondary thing that could happen to excite them. That's BAD design. What you're asking for is actually a BAD thing. You just haven't realized it. i mean you cant compare what it was like 20 years ago, to what it is now. the type of people playing these games are people in their late 20-s to mid 40's. you know people who actually have jobs who cant spend 3-4 hours a day to just die once and lose a week/fortnights progress. it turns people off the game, and they quit.	Posté par Turtlerer#3183 le 18 mars 2025 02:23:07 Citer ce post
I agree 100% with OP, everyone should wake up GGG is toying with the player based. If GGG can provide the player based Waystone XXX Level 100 we can easily level up to 100. But why is GGG holding us back, because of player retention. The basic mechanics in any online game. They want us to keep playing, but it got backfired with GGG because majority of the casual players already left. Dernière édition par MarcoBezzecchi#3752, le 18 mars 2025 03:58:55	Posté par MarcoBezzecchi#3752 le 18 mars 2025 03:58:20 Citer ce post
" MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit : I agree 100% with OP, everyone should wake up GGG is toying with the player based. If GGG can provide the player based Waystone XXX Level 100 we can easily level up to 100. But why is GGG holding us back, because of player retention. The basic mechanics in any online game. They want us to keep playing, but it got backfired with GGG because majority of the casual players already left. It backfired because casuals left? You know, it would only be considered "backfired" if the "filter" would not filter. Anyway. Do you have any proof for your claim that "the majority of casual players left because they were unable to reach level 100"? It's a rhetorical question, but you can still try to answer if you are funny.	Posté par JakkerONAIR#4902 le 18 mars 2025 04:06:38 Citer ce post
" JakkerONAIR#4902 a écrit : " MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit : I agree 100% with OP, everyone should wake up GGG is toying with the player based. If GGG can provide the player based Waystone XXX Level 100 we can easily level up to 100. But why is GGG holding us back, because of player retention. The basic mechanics in any online game. They want us to keep playing, but it got backfired with GGG because majority of the casual players already left. It backfired because casuals left? You know, it would only be considered "backfired" if the "filter" would not filter. Anyway. Do you have any proof for your claim that "the majority of casual players left because they were unable to reach level 100"? It's a rhetorical question, but you can still try to answer if you are funny. LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . .	Posté par MarcoBezzecchi#3752 le 18 mars 2025 04:57:20 Citer ce post
" MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit : LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . . Nope. YOU not understanding what you are looking at does not equal "truth".	Posté par JakkerONAIR#4902 le 18 mars 2025 05:09:58 Citer ce post
" JakkerONAIR#4902 a écrit : " MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit : LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . . Nope. YOU not understanding what you are looking at does not equal "truth". LOL, the chart your looking at is for POE 1 not POE 2, that's the problem. Dernière édition par MarcoBezzecchi#3752, le 18 mars 2025 05:24:18	Posté par MarcoBezzecchi#3752 le 18 mars 2025 05:24:05 Citer ce post
" MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit : " JakkerONAIR#4902 a écrit : " MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit : LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . . Nope. YOU not understanding what you are looking at does not equal "truth". LOL, the chart your looking at is for POE 1 not POE 2, that's the problem. Again and again and again... PoE1: https://poedb.tw/us/League#ConcurrentPlayers PoE2: https://poe2db.tw/us/League	Posté par JakkerONAIR#4902 le 18 mars 2025 05:27:06 Citer ce post