lvl 95 and I am done!

"

InterfaceBoy#4817 a écrit :

sorry no.

if players can reach Lv100 easily, they just quit playing, which will reduce the daily active number, then GGG can't show a good report to Tencent.

"

Originalx9#7672 a écrit :

Hard disagree. It doesn't even take half as many hours to get to 100 here as it did to get to 99 in diablo 2 pre terror zones....and a LOT of people were happy with that. Plus, ARPG's learned the hard way that levels are smart to basically allow to never cap, that way there's at least almost always something to chase. Every ARPG that added a max level you get to real fast ended up in a vicious cycle of players doing dungeons, to get more loot, to do dungeons, to get more loot, to do dungeons, to get more loot....there was never a secondary thing that could happen to excite them. That's BAD design. What you're asking for is actually a BAD thing. You just haven't realized it.

"

MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit :

I agree 100% with OP, everyone should wake up GGG is toying with the player based.

If GGG can provide the player based Waystone XXX Level 100 we can easily level up to 100.

But why is GGG holding us back, because of player retention. The basic mechanics in any online game. They want us to keep playing, but it got backfired with GGG because majority of the casual players already left.

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 a écrit :

"

MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit :

I agree 100% with OP, everyone should wake up GGG is toying with the player based.

If GGG can provide the player based Waystone XXX Level 100 we can easily level up to 100.

But why is GGG holding us back, because of player retention. The basic mechanics in any online game. They want us to keep playing, but it got backfired with GGG because majority of the casual players already left.

It backfired because casuals left?

You know, it would only be considered "backfired" if the "filter" would not filter. Anyway.

Do you have any proof for your claim that "the majority of casual players left because they were unable to reach level 100"?
It's a rhetorical question, but you can still try to answer if you are funny.

"

MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit :

LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . .

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 a écrit :

"

MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit :

LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . .

Nope. YOU not understanding what you are looking at does not equal "truth".

"

MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit :

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 a écrit :

"

MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit :

LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . .

Nope. YOU not understanding what you are looking at does not equal "truth".

LOL, the chart your looking at is for POE 1 not POE 2, that's the problem.

"

MarcoBezzecchi#3752 a écrit :

"

JakkerONAIR#4902 a écrit :

Do you have any proof for your claim that "the majority of casual players left because they were unable to reach level 100"?
It's a rhetorical question, but you can still try to answer if you are funny.

LOL look at the charts it only says 100% Truthfullness . . .