How to fix the whole Righteous Fire problem

Wrong wrong wrong and wrong


RF problem rely in the bonus it gives
Its not hard... keep the skill as it is, BUT
make the spell damage bonus apply only when you are burning LIFE not Es

I use shavs, got 9200 es, 440 regen per sec. I use rf in every single map besides no regen + -max. No regen by itself is easy if you use FP with life leech. Only mod I actually ever reroll is Blood Magic. Truthfully, Low life RF is a little OP, and the simplest way to fix this is to just reduce the more spell damage mod on RF by a bit. No need to change anything else dramatically.

"

Kyu a écrit :

People figure out amazing builds and the first thing people want is to nerf them... Then when every single good build combination has been nerfed to the ground everyone will start complaining that there's no good build combinations. Nice. I love self destructive communities. How about we buff other things that are bad instead of nerfing the things that are good. That way everyone wins, hooray.

Let's create a skill that says "You kill all monsters on the map if you are at least lv50, 0 seconds cooldown, 1 second cast time, requires 3 links, ignores reflect", then people find the amazing build that revolves around high MF and that skill. Omg, people thought for 3 seconds and found an amazing build, GGG plz don't nerf.

"

mazul a écrit :

"

Kyu a écrit :

People figure out amazing builds and the first thing people want is to nerf them... Then when every single good build combination has been nerfed to the ground everyone will start complaining that there's no good build combinations. Nice. I love self destructive communities. How about we buff other things that are bad instead of nerfing the things that are good. That way everyone wins, hooray.

Let's create a skill that says "You kill all monsters on the map if you are at least lv50, 0 seconds cooldown, 1 second cast time, requires 3 links, ignores reflect", then people find the amazing build that revolves around high MF and that skill. Omg, people thought for 3 seconds and found an amazing build, GGG plz don't nerf.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum

"

entropus a écrit :

"

mazul a écrit :

"

Kyu a écrit :

People figure out amazing builds and the first thing people want is to nerf them... Then when every single good build combination has been nerfed to the ground everyone will start complaining that there's no good build combinations. Nice. I love self destructive communities. How about we buff other things that are bad instead of nerfing the things that are good. That way everyone wins, hooray.

Let's create a skill that says "You kill all monsters on the map if you are at least lv50, 0 seconds cooldown, 1 second cast time, requires 3 links, ignores reflect", then people find the amazing build that revolves around high MF and that skill. Omg, people thought for 3 seconds and found an amazing build, GGG plz don't nerf.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum

I don't know if you are against or for what I implied by what I said in the post you quoted XD.

So is RF acually OP @ multiple specs or are people just whinging about sporkers again - RF is not a 'spark-only' synergy. People so concerned about what other people are doing rather than providing suggestions to 'fix' their own specs / skills etc etc.

"

ScrotieMcB a écrit :

"

Zanixx a écrit :

What's the problem with RF atm?

Ever heard of low-life Spork?

And FYI, i had a sporker, not low-life. Thanks for asking?

To basically sum up this QQ thread like many others that have sprout out, since righteous fire is linked to Shavronne. : wah wah I don't have shavronne's. Well if I can't have shavronne's, everyone else can't enjoy it !

There is no problem with RF, if you want to use it you have to make a serious investment in life regen, ES regen, passive points and either huge ES or specific regen items.

"

Zanixx a écrit :

So is RF acually OP @ multiple specs or are people just whinging about sporkers again - RF is not a 'spark-only' synergy.

Correct.

Nor is Shav's heinously OP; it's just a low-life (meaning PA) enabler. It has synergy with RF, but it's not the same strategy at all; RF doesn't require low-life, it just requires non-CI ES. If it isn't obvious to everyone, you don't need to be jealous of Shav's owners, you can make a build with more ES cheaper, still keep your life up (including a life flask) as a Chaos cushion, and run RF just fine. All RF needs to be enabled is Zealot's Oath and some life regen nodes; that's it.

Which means, yes, I am attacking a build, not gear. I thought this was obvious when I suggesting nerfing a skill gem in the OP, but I imagine if their wasn't confusion involved I wouldn't have needed to write the paragraph before this one.

"

Shogen a écrit :

To basically sum up this QQ thread like many others that have sprout out, since righteous fire is linked to Shavronne. : wah wah I don't have shavronne's. Well if I can't have shavronne's, everyone else can't enjoy it !

If it only were that simple :D. Whining about Shavronne's, Kaoms and Lioneyes has happened for many months both by people who own them and do not own them. There is a reason for why Kaom was removed from Onslaught and Anarchy.