i quit after 400 hours bacouse exp lose

"

Kerchunk#7797 a écrit :

"

CovidPatientZero#0332 a écrit :

You are completely misrepresenting why people want lvl100. It's not the "ultimate goal" or "the end of the game". Do you even bother listening to the reasons?

I gotta say man, that's a wild way to begin a post which then goes on to mention exactly none of these supposed "reasons."

The only reason to level past ~94 is because you want to say you got past level 94. There is no content in the game you can do at 100 that you can't do at 94. There are no areas or items or skills that require you to be level 100 and no matter your build you will have enough points by 94 to be successful and clear all content.

Getting to level 100 is a badge of honor that is by no means or measure necessary. I'm not saying people shouldn't try for 100 if that's what they want to do, but acting like it's a necessary part of "finishing" the game is just goofy nonsense.

XP loss is the only thing that makes death scary. Without it, there's no reason to be careful or play well-balancedd builds with good defenses.

"

CovidPatientZero#0332 a écrit :

"

Kerchunk#7797 a écrit :

"

CovidPatientZero#0332 a écrit :

You are completely misrepresenting why people want lvl100. It's not the "ultimate goal" or "the end of the game". Do you even bother listening to the reasons?

I gotta say man, that's a wild way to begin a post which then goes on to mention exactly none of these supposed "reasons."

The only reason to level past ~94 is because you want to say you got past level 94. There is no content in the game you can do at 100 that you can't do at 94. There are no areas or items or skills that require you to be level 100 and no matter your build you will have enough points by 94 to be successful and clear all content.

Getting to level 100 is a badge of honor that is by no means or measure necessary. I'm not saying people shouldn't try for 100 if that's what they want to do, but acting like it's a necessary part of "finishing" the game is just goofy nonsense.

XP loss is the only thing that makes death scary. Without it, there's no reason to be careful or play well-balancedd builds with good defenses.

There you go, assuming why I want to get past lvl 94 and you couldn't be more wrong. Just shows you have absolutely no clue. I've listed the reasons numerous times in this forum, so have others, you're free to go read the posts.

I don't care about bragging rights. I don't care if you think I don't need to get past 94.

It's funny that you completely contradict yourself. You say that it doesn't matter to get past 94, then you go on and say XP loss is the only thing that makes death scary.

And no, as I've explained several times, it doesn't force well balanced builds. It forces meta screening clearing builds that minimize the use of defense. The game is not balanced and defenses are just flat out bad.

"

CovidPatientZero#0332 a écrit :

There's still passives to be gained. You say it doesn't matter, well good for you then don't worry about it. It matters to me and a lot of other people.

You keep saying there's zero content requiring lvl100, you also say no one needs to level that high, yet you also say the XP penalty is necessary so death matters and there's a challenge. Makes zero sense by your own logic. If XP loss makes death matter and adds a challenge, then you are admitting leveling to 100 is an important goal and does matter. If we don't need to lvl past the low 90s, then XP penalty shouldn't affect you in any way and it's irrelevant.

Either admit lvl100 is important to you or stop saying death penalty makes death matter and adds a challenge. If 100 is irrelevant then so is the death penalty. You're talking out of both sides of your face

"

Valsacar#0268 a écrit :

"

CovidPatientZero#0332 a écrit :

There's still passives to be gained. You say it doesn't matter, well good for you then don't worry about it. It matters to me and a lot of other people.

You keep saying there's zero content requiring lvl100, you also say no one needs to level that high, yet you also say the XP penalty is necessary so death matters and there's a challenge. Makes zero sense by your own logic. If XP loss makes death matter and adds a challenge, then you are admitting leveling to 100 is an important goal and does matter. If we don't need to lvl past the low 90s, then XP penalty shouldn't affect you in any way and it's irrelevant.

Either admit lvl100 is important to you or stop saying death penalty makes death matter and adds a challenge. If 100 is irrelevant then so is the death penalty. You're talking out of both sides of your face

I think you have things a bit backwards there, and you have still completely avoided the question. What is it that makes you think level 100 is needed?

A couple of passive points at that stage are making no significant change to a build.

No content is gated behind levels.

As others have said repeatedly, level 100 in POE1 and POE2 is just a number for "bragging rights" or a personal achievement. It makes no significant difference in gameplay. It's only "value" is in the time and difficulty in getting it, which XP loss on death supports.

So, answer the question that you claim you have answered multiple times. Why is level 100 important?

"

Rabarbar_Lichy#7553 a écrit :

I will quit if they remove it, what now