Albino Rhoa Feathers!!

"

Saltychipmunk a écrit :

"

whoismiked a écrit :

"

Saltychipmunk a écrit :

and it was not welcomed by everyone either, again you are viewing my complaint in terms of positive and negative impacts , when what i have the problem with is that it has an impact.

there is a difference ,

i dont care if it was positive , i dont care if it was negative . what i care about is that it had an impact , and the way in which it was introduced was handled rather laxly .

to use an annology,

i dont care if rocking the boat causes the fisherman to fall into the water , or a fish to jump into his lap , i find the act of rocking the boat with no warning to be incredibility annoying .

I see the point you are trying to make, but your point really doesn't hold any water unless the 'impact' was negative, which it was not universally negative, it was positive for some (I would say a majority) and negative for some others.


I fail to see the issue here.

but we just established that the 20% formula did have both a positive AND negative impact depending on who you asked

you argue the gcp was declining in value, but that does not mean its value had already settled , normally then people who cared would have time to off load their gcp investments before losses were significant.

but by introducing the 20% recipe ggg robbed those people of their chance to recoup the inevitable losses that would have gradually happened.

they artificially , prematurely and with almost no warning crashed the value of the gcp before people had the chance to react and adapt.
it is all about timing.

"

Zguza_Do_Suz4 a écrit :

"

DalaiLama a écrit :

So.. once a recipe.is found, it has a limited lifetime

Ok,why no1 then publish results of old recepies,since they dont work anymore....

"

txfirefighter a écrit :

But Chris said info on the feathers will be given before the next patch...?

"

Oxyn a écrit :

"

whoismiked a écrit :

And?

You are acting as if the GCP changing in demand and 'value' was some sort of tragedy.

It was far from it, in fact it was better for everyone for many reasons, but just to name a few:

1. 20% gems were hard to come by and/or massively overpriced, now they are more accessible to people and fairly priced.

2. Gcp 'value' stabilized to a fair rate in which they are actually worthwhile to use them. That's right, orbs actually getting used for their intended purpose instead of just stockpiled. The 'value of GCp's were already on a rapid decline before the recipe was even figured out because literally NO ONE used GCP's on gems, they were just stockpiled for trading, thus the supply only grew and grew, thus lowering their value as supply exceeded demand.

The GCP recipe was not detrimental to anything as you are making it out to be, it was in fact a good thing, both for the people and the economy, get over it.

You just gave an excellent summation of exactly why they didn't need to make the change. If the supply of a commodity is already building and the value going down, there is no reason to artificially lower the price of that commodity - the free market is already doing it.