For the love of god... (another pants thread)

"
And if you don't mind it, you should all still take it seriously because it does repulse a LOT of people. I realized that after discussing about it multiple times in gaming communities, tried to convert friends from Failablo 3 and the reaction of nearly everyone after seeing a pantsless POE character. Open your eyes, it is a huge minus for the game itself.

And I dont want those people in my game. If diablo 3 fanbase is shallow enough to drop a game because of pantless old men intimidiating them with their manliness, they should stay where they are.

Im waiting for pantsu-less witches ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)


Obviously there are no pants in game.
We fight to delay the end because it's the means that matter.
"
Shival a écrit :
"
And if you don't mind it, you should all still take it seriously because it does repulse a LOT of people. I realized that after discussing about it multiple times in gaming communities, tried to convert friends from Failablo 3 and the reaction of nearly everyone after seeing a pantsless POE character. Open your eyes, it is a huge minus for the game itself.

And I dont want those people in my game. If diablo 3 fanbase is shallow enough to drop a game because of pantless old men intimidiating them with their manliness, they should stay where they are.

Im waiting for pantsu-less witches ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)


Unfortunately some people are that shallow, yes. They may dismiss it at first glance. But, most, if they take some time to check the game better they will love it for its depth. And, in the end, don't forget that these people will benefit the game we love.


"
Timewar9 a écrit :


Obviously there are no pants in game.


As I mentioned earlier in the thread, there are only a few armors in the game that come with pants. The vast majority does not.
"
RestInPieces a écrit :
It's ok to start pants-less. But reaching 70+ with a witch/templar wearing a mini-skirt? Seriously?


As you mentioned earlier in the thread.
We fight to delay the end because it's the means that matter.
"
Timewar9 a écrit :
"
RestInPieces a écrit :
It's ok to start pants-less. But reaching 70+ with a witch/templar wearing a mini-skirt? Seriously?


As you mentioned earlier in the thread.


"As I mentioned earlier in my thread", which you probably haven't read well, the only character I happen to have at the moment who is not pants-less is my evasion duelist, since a good deal of the evasion sets are full body armors.

Your earlier post with the armors only proves my point. There are only a handful of armors that cover pants, ergo this does not disprove what you quoted. For example when it comes to ES armors only the regalia covers the legs, everything else is exactly like wearing a mini-skirt.

Dernière édition par RestInPieces#6294, le 28 juil. 2015 à 17:42:14
Bump, the lack of pants is too anti-aesthetic to ignore. And years later nothing has been done about it. Personally I haven't even seen anyone comment on this from GGG.
Pants? We don't need no stinkin' pants!



yes, i've been asking for this since the game came out.
"
Holocaustus a écrit :
He can trade pants with the Scion. No armor looks good on her because the blue pants and stockings keep sticking out.

Now, that's just nasty. What did the poor Scion do to deserve being forced to wear the Templar's damp pants?

Give her a G-String of Protection from Evil and be done with it. It fits her new and "improved" dialogue better than the dignified but torn clothing she was first issued anyhow.

(Also, there is one armour that looks pretty good on the Scion - the Vaal Regalia.)
Unless the PANTLESS CHARS get pants i just wont play them
Thats why I play just shadow and duelist
WE WANT PANTS GGG !!!

Signaler

Compte à signaler :

Type de signalement

Infos supplémentaires