https://www.pathofexile.com/forum/view-thread/2092600
"
The increased quantity of items from slain normal enemies has been reduced from 50-100% down to 35-50%.
Before Bisco's effective IIQ was 30-40% with 0 investment into normal monsters, doesn't look as OP compared to competitors (Ascetic (15%) / Shaper's (10% max roll) ammy) anymore. Dernière édition par SunL4D2#6224, le 26 févr. 2018 à 23:32:27 Dernier bump le 28 févr. 2018 à 10:33:46
|
Posté parSunL4D2#6224le 26 févr. 2018 à 23:31:59
|
Much like manufactured news, leaving out the next line for people too lazy to read the entire post
"
This sounds like a huge nerf, but with the way that diminishing returns work for item quantity, it's not as bad as it sounds.
|
Posté parImaginaerum#5568le 26 févr. 2018 à 23:47:25
|
|
With zero IIQ, 100% bisco gives roughly 25.8 more drops, 505 bisco gives roughly 17% more drops.
It was never deserving of a nerf in the first place.
IGN: Arlianth
Check out my LA build: 1782214 Dernière édition par Nephalim#2731, le 26 févr. 2018 à 23:51:20
|
Posté parNephalim#2731le 26 févr. 2018 à 23:51:10
|
"
Nephalim a écrit :
With zero IIQ, 100% bisco gives roughly 25.8 more drops, 505 bisco gives roughly 17% more drops.
It was never deserving of a nerf in the first place.
Based on what exactly? Theoretical calculations don't really add up according to my thorough testing. Bisco's is much more powerful than people believe (was it 18-22% IIQ according to some sketchy calculation?).
|
Posté parSunL4D2#6224le 26 févr. 2018 à 23:58:23
|
|
Even it's a nerf but so what ? If you want to farm stuff then you MUST use it, then basically, your gear won't change, so nothing changed
Dernière édition par cuocdoitan#5719, le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:01:26
|
Posté parcuocdoitan#5719le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:01:08
|
"
SunL4D2 a écrit :
"
Nephalim a écrit :
With zero IIQ, 100% bisco gives roughly 25.8 more drops, 505 bisco gives roughly 17% more drops.
It was never deserving of a nerf in the first place.
Based on what exactly? Theoretical calculations don't really add up according to my thorough testing. Bisco's is much more powerful than people believe (was it 18-22% IIQ according to some sketchy calculation?).
Data seems reasonable but only GGG knows the exact forumula. It is fairly agreed upon bisco is equal to 18-22 raw iiq though.
https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/7zyyu8/the_formula_behind_iiq_and_how_many_drops_you_get/
IGN: Arlianth
Check out my LA build: 1782214 Dernière édition par Nephalim#2731, le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:04:51
|
Posté parNephalim#2731le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:04:28
|
"
SunL4D2 a écrit :
"
Nephalim a écrit :
With zero IIQ, 100% bisco gives roughly 25.8 more drops, 505 bisco gives roughly 17% more drops.
It was never deserving of a nerf in the first place.
Based on what exactly? Theoretical calculations don't really add up according to my thorough testing. Bisco's is much more powerful than people believe (was it 18-22% IIQ according to some sketchy calculation?).
And what exactly makes your thorough testing not at all sketchy ? lol, you know the more posts you make like this, the more you just appear to be a total prick
If theres still no better alternative, then it will remain BIS, and wont affect the value of it, infact itll just create more legacy ones, upping their value over time.
Dernière édition par awright#1711, le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:23:55
|
Posté parawright#1711le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:22:20
|
"
Nephalim a écrit :
"
SunL4D2 a écrit :
"
Nephalim a écrit :
With zero IIQ, 100% bisco gives roughly 25.8 more drops, 505 bisco gives roughly 17% more drops.
It was never deserving of a nerf in the first place.
Based on what exactly? Theoretical calculations don't really add up according to my thorough testing. Bisco's is much more powerful than people believe (was it 18-22% IIQ according to some sketchy calculation?).
Data seems reasonable but only GGG knows the exact forumula. It is fairly agreed upon bisco is equal to 18-22 raw iiq though.
https://www.reddit.com/r/pathofexile/comments/7zyyu8/the_formula_behind_iiq_and_how_many_drops_you_get/
Yeah, that guy does great job, but actual results results speak better to me than reasonable assumptions.
I actually hope it's gonne be dirty cheap because of mass hysteria and overreaction, so I can get desirable corruption on still BIS IIQ ammy this time. :p
"
awright a écrit :
"
SunL4D2 a écrit :
"
Nephalim a écrit :
With zero IIQ, 100% bisco gives roughly 25.8 more drops, 505 bisco gives roughly 17% more drops.
It was never deserving of a nerf in the first place.
Based on what exactly? Theoretical calculations don't really add up according to my thorough testing. Bisco's is much more powerful than people believe (was it 18-22% IIQ according to some sketchy calculation?).
And what exactly makes your thorough testing not at all sketchy ? lol, you know the more posts you make like this, the more you just appear to be a total prick
If theres still no better alternative, then it will remain BIS, and wont affect the value of it, infact itll just create more legacy ones, upping their value over time.
Practical results > Theoretical reults.
Dernière édition par SunL4D2#6224, le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:49:49
|
Posté parSunL4D2#6224le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:47:25
|
"
SunL4D2 a écrit :
Practical results > Theoretical reults.
So I presume you have logged your practical results and have a strong enough dataset to make a statement like that yes ?
|
Posté parawright#1711le 27 févr. 2018 à 00:53:17
|
|
Only 2 threads in less than 10 minutes? Where's the third one? You're slacking.
On point your practical results are not only debatable but also inexistent. Or you'd have posted them in your main.
|
Posté parHallsttattian#5425le 27 févr. 2018 à 01:20:54
|
