"
"
"
This will actually change nothing imo. The most effective players will always control economy no matter what. They wouldn't be able to group with bots yes but still they will be miles ahead.
Doesn't matter. What does matter is that you have more of an equal opportunity chance to compete.
You think group play is unfair, you are objectively wrong and it has been covered REPEATEDLY for years in POE1 and then again in POE2. Groups do NOT drop more loot than they would running solo.
Your idea also completely ignores reality. People who are more efficient and play more hours will drop more stuff. If your FOMO is that bad, either walk away or step up and join them.
Nothing has ever been proven anywhere. You just have e-celebs like Empyrian who don't talk about the full picture or all of the advantages group players actually have, and then you have sheep, like yourself, who eat it up without considering for yourself all of the advantages those group players have and whether or not it's actually any good for the game as a whole. That's it.
|
|
|
I feel rarer items brings more longevity
|
Posté pareye_356#2542le 7 janv. 2026 à 15:57:36
|
"
This will actually change nothing imo. The most effective players will always control economy no matter what. They wouldn't be able to group with bots yes but still they will be miles ahead.
Doesn't matter. What does matter is that you have more of an equal opportunity chance to compete.
You think group play is unfair, you are objectively wrong and it has been covered REPEATEDLY for years in POE1 and then again in POE2. Groups do NOT drop more loot than they would running solo.
Your idea also completely ignores reality. People who are more efficient and play more hours will drop more stuff. If your FOMO is that bad, either walk away or step up and join them.
Nothing has ever been proven anywhere. You just have e-celebs like Empyrian who don't talk about the full picture or all of the advantages group players actually have, and then you have sheep, like yourself, who eat it up without considering for yourself all of the advantages those group players have and whether or not it's actually any good for the game as a whole. That's it.
and than of course we have the people purposely downplaying group play in an effort to try and prevent it from getting balanced properly.
Dernière édition par ZaruenVoresu#5823, le 7 janv. 2026 à 16:08:46
|
Posté parZaruenVoresu#5823le 7 janv. 2026 à 16:08:36
|
"
"
This will actually change nothing imo. The most effective players will always control economy no matter what. They wouldn't be able to group with bots yes but still they will be miles ahead.
Doesn't matter. What does matter is that you have more of an equal opportunity chance to compete.
You think group play is unfair, you are objectively wrong and it has been covered REPEATEDLY for years in POE1 and then again in POE2. Groups do NOT drop more loot than they would running solo.
Your idea also completely ignores reality. People who are more efficient and play more hours will drop more stuff. If your FOMO is that bad, either walk away or step up and join them.
Nothing has ever been proven anywhere. You just have e-celebs like Empyrian who don't talk about the full picture or all of the advantages group players actually have, and then you have sheep, like yourself, who eat it up without considering for yourself all of the advantages those group players have and whether or not it's actually any good for the game as a whole. That's it.
and than of course we have the people purposely downplaying group play in an effort to try and prevent it from getting balanced properly.
and he acts like anything that was "proven" in POE 1 applies to POE 2 group play even though rarity doesn't affect currency in POE 1, which means the fundamental nature of group play in POE 2 is drastically different than it is in POE 1 right away from the very start of the conversation.
Making it so rarity doesn't affect currency in POE 2 and deleting the Gravebind culler gloves would go a long way towards balancing the game properly.
|
|
