Accuracy description is wrong

"

Dontevensay#4338 a écrit :

"

AintCare#6513 a écrit :

"

Dontevensay#4338 a écrit :

Enemy projectiles are no longer spells, there is no enemy spell damage in PoE2.
https://www.poe2wiki.net/wiki/Acrobatics
Acrobatics is only there to help you evade enemy Slam skills.

hmmm? am i missing something here?
https://www.poe2wiki.net/wiki/Spell

Yes. In an interview, Jonathan Rogers stated that 'it was too confusing to tell if an enemy projectile was a spell or attack, so we removed this distinction'

In other words, there are no enemy spells anymore. At all. Some descriptions in game reflect this. The wiki is technically correct in that 'spells are not affected by evasion' because no enemy projectile is considered a spell anymore - but this is unclear in game.

"

BlastYa#4875 a écrit :

"

MonaHuna#6449 a écrit :

Armour, actually...

I watched it twice, he said evasion. (the chineese interview)

Hint: It's during the question about evasion.

"The other issue that i feel is even greater, wich we're actualy considering what we should do here, is that it's not always clear what attacks are evadable and wich attack are not evadable and so i think this is something we can do a lot to improve. So in 0.3.0 we actualy do have some discussion to have about changing the evasion mechanic to allow it to be more reliable potentially but we havent fully decided exactly what we're doing here yet"

"

MonaHuna#6449 a écrit :

"

BlastYa#4875 a écrit :

"

MonaHuna#6449 a écrit :

Armour, actually...

I watched it twice, he said evasion. (the chineese interview)

Hint: It's during the question about evasion.

"The other issue that i feel is even greater, wich we're actualy considering what we should do here, is that it's not always clear what attacks are evadable and wich attack are not evadable and so i think this is something we can do a lot to improve. So in 0.3.0 we actualy do have some discussion to have about changing the evasion mechanic to allow it to be more reliable potentially but we havent fully decided exactly what we're doing here yet"

Ah, you meant that interview on bilibili. The isuue chinese players raised there was that it's not clear when evasion proc'ed, so it may feel like it doesn't work at all. And Jonathan answered that he'd like to add some sort of visual feedback on successful evade, but:
– (the main obstacle) It's an effort-intensive task because technically, (if I got it right) due to how evasion is implemented, this feature's code has to be added to every skill. It can’t simply be added once to some "evasion code" to work globally;
– (a small one) There's no perfect place for such indicator to be noticeable for players (maybe in life globe, he suggested).

Then the part you quoted goes. And again, it's a visual clarity thing. The imporvements they're planning will help as better identify unevadable skills. He didn't mean they'd rework evasion in 0.3. The last sentence is more like a buffer to soften the refusal (damage control/PR stuff).