XP penalty and likely 1 portal is NOT going anywhere

"

PlaceboBonbon50#8677 a écrit :

One portal just sucks. I'm out of waystones because of that.

People are working, people are tired, people are distracted...
I hate the 1 portal bull s t

Don't play glasscannon garbage. When you distracted you can pause the game.

"

Z3RoNightMare#7140 a écrit :

Because they understand the difference from artificial difficulty and actual difficulty. Gating multiple tries behind multiple hours of grinding is the cheapest of ploys, and unfortunately, they leaned into it.

"

dwqrf#0717 a écrit :

So as expected, you answer "I'm never wrong" even though it's five persons telling you that you are wrong.

Problem found. Case dismissed.

Please, keep trying to discredit me with zero tangible evidence. It's working.

"

dwqrf#0717 a écrit :

And so what ???

Please, learn to make your own arguments instead of relying in the Tu Quoque falalcy.

Ok [Removed by Support]
Let's talk about this rationaly.

First, this is about You, not me, because you are the one complaining about the reality of the game. So it's about your opinion, not mine.

While you are entitled to have your opinion, it being "I don't like being punished for dying", you can't say "the game is objectively bad", because that's a lie to push your self made narrative.

Last time in another topic I said : "the game objective actual reality is to have on portal per death per map" to which you replied "that's an objective false statement", so it has been proven you lie and don't understand the meaning of objective reality.

In this topic, you proved you don't ever believe to be wrong.

With all this data, it's quite simple to figure out You think of yourself as a really good player, which is your own thought - which you have the right to own - as you can't stop believing to be always right and you are "objectively" sure that's the case.

So when the game punishes you for your own mistakes and own failures, pushing you back and stopping you from showing off your progress, it's sure that's for You it's a problem with the game, not with Yourself, never, that's not possible. The game is objectively punishing every player in the same way when they do mistakes, but for you it's a game/devs problem, while for me and many others, it's our own fault for failling to master the set rules. I admit it, I do suck and I do die sometimes, that happens, and it's fair and deserved, I can only git guder.

So as you can't accept that a machine is objectively telling you that you failed, somewhere in your build/gear/gameplay, you come here to complain and have it changed so no one could ever be able to tell that you failed. Remember, the machine isn't punishing just you, it's punishing every players equally, but most can live with it.

So if the devs gave us unlimited portal and no XP penalty, you would play the game and die 15.000 times over 1.000h bashing your head against a wall of content, and after reaching level 100 and killing the last pinacle boss, you would scream at everyone : "See ! I'm the best player in the world and that was so easy to beat this game !"

To which Hardcore players would respond "Hu... You know we did the same without even dying once ?"

To which you will respond "Stop your fallacies, we all know Softcore and Hardcore are OBJECTIVELY EXACTLY the same game !"

LOL.

"

Z3RoNightMare#7140 a écrit :

.

Asks for gameplay differences gets told gameplay differences responds with
Nope I’m right fake news

You see op? Give it enough time they walk themselves into their own words

"

dwqrf#0717 a écrit :

LOL.

I think that guy that says "ssf and trade is same" just ragebaiting. Better to ignore it.

"

PaintMaster#2396 a écrit :

"

dwqrf#0717 a écrit :

LOL.

I think that guy that says "ssf and trade is same" just ragebaiting. Better to ignore it.

Oh yea 100% lol.

As long as there is only one portal I will not play Poe-2, there are more games that are kinder to the player and do not waste their time foolishly.

"

Bebehercio#4402 a écrit :

As long as there is only one portal I will not play Poe-2, there are more games that are kinder to the player and do not waste their time foolishly.

Ok, have fun

I don't mind losing XP gained on a current map upon death. What pi**es me off is when I lose all the XP gained on previous maps that I DID complete and accumulate fairly. XP loss on death should be limited to current maps only! EOD

"

FantomChaser#5155 a écrit :

I don't mind losing XP gained on a current map upon death. What pi**es me off is when I lose all the XP gained on previous maps that I DID complete and accumulate fairly. XP loss on death should be limited to current maps only! EOD

That's interesting suggestion, but it feels too insignificant, almost like not having penalty at all.

I don't care enough, one way or other on the subject. GGG will do whatever GGG wants. but your 6 points don't make sense.

"

PaintMaster#2396 a écrit :

1. Literally 0 reason investing into defense at all.

6. It once again remove any reason investing into defense above bare minimum.

These statements are inconsistent. 1 is "invest at all", 6 is "invest above bare minimum".
If you have to invest to be above the "bare minimum", then it can't be "at all".

Which rationale are you going with ?

"

PaintMaster#2396 a écrit :

2. It doesn't matter if you die or not, you still have more portals anyway.

The title is "XP penalty and likely 1 portal is NOT going anywhere".
If XP Penalty is removed, and 1 portal stays this statement is false as only 1 portal.
If XP Penalty stays, but 5 portals are added this statement is false as every death gives an XP penalty.
Only if both the XP Penalty is removed, and 5 portal are added then this statement partially correct on both counts. You can still run out of portals.

"

PaintMaster#2396 a écrit :

4. This encourage people play builds that clear screens with half of gear being rarity and 0 defenses.

People don't need to be encouraged to play builds that clear the fastest and with the best chance of loot/currency, XP loss & portal numbers are irrelevant to that.
The 2nd half of the sentance is false. Your now using builds with 0 defenses as a rationale. You can't technically have 0 defense as it is inherent on gear.

"

PaintMaster#2396 a écrit :

5. It just delete build diversity.

You cannot "Delete" build diversity.. If you delete build diversity, then there is only 1 playable build in the entire game.