Community Designed Divination Card - Poll #3

"

IcedInferno007 a écrit :

You guys have completely lost the plot, you Don't give a damn about your playerbase. Two thirds wanted a magic watchstone, so how the hell have you come up with a unique one? You just do whatever the hell you want, I really think there needs to be a change at GGG...

"

"

IcedInferno007 a écrit :

You guys have completely lost the plot, you Don't give a damn about your playerbase. Two thirds wanted a magic watchstone, so how the hell have you come up with a unique one? You just do whatever the hell you want, I really think there needs to be a change at GGG...

The community did technically choose what they wanted. But the metric in which that was decided was not well executed.

It's not whatever the hell they wanted, the issue was that there was no poll prior to it that chose between unique or magic watch stone, then split off from that point. You're getting upset, and reasonably so, but you failed to see the cause of what actually made the decision.

The voting options were designed poorly. They split the voter base for the magic watchstones by providing 4 options for magic, and 2 options for unique, therefore anyone who wanted a unique watchstone would pick from one of the 2, and those that wanted a magic watchstone would have to pick from 1 of 4.

The community managers inadvertently used the political tactic of division of a voterbase with the lack of tiered voting or a preliminary vote to determine the base.

"

Exile009 a écrit :

"

"

IcedInferno007 a écrit :

You guys have completely lost the plot, you Don't give a damn about your playerbase. Two thirds wanted a magic watchstone, so how the hell have you come up with a unique one? You just do whatever the hell you want, I really think there needs to be a change at GGG...

The community did technically choose what they wanted. But the metric in which that was decided was not well executed.

It's not whatever the hell they wanted, the issue was that there was no poll prior to it that chose between unique or magic watch stone, then split off from that point. You're getting upset, and reasonably so, but you failed to see the cause of what actually made the decision.

The voting options were designed poorly. They split the voter base for the magic watchstones by providing 4 options for magic, and 2 options for unique, therefore anyone who wanted a unique watchstone would pick from one of the 2, and those that wanted a magic watchstone would have to pick from 1 of 4.

The community managers inadvertently used the political tactic of division of a voterbase with the lack of tiered voting or a preliminary vote to determine the base.

In other words, the Spoiler Effect. But whatever. Nations choose presidents / prime ministers using the same method, so I'd hardly hold it against them doing the same here. It likely wasn't intentional, just a default poll design.

"

Tuminure a écrit :

"

Community_Team a écrit :

The community has decided on 'Any Unique Watchstone'.!

This happens when you can't create good polls and/or can't read results. 36.3% voted for unique watchstone and 63.7% voted for magic watchstone so the community wants magic watchstone. Not the unique.