You can remove delve now...

Can someone explain to me WHY it would be bad if we were able to run Delve more often? I'm not convinced the rewards are even that great, but if they are couldn't they just be reduced?

More sulphite, please. Let us play the content you spent a ton of $$$ on developing, please. Thanks.

i just got over 7k sulphite over a couple times seeing niko. i was able to go from depth 130 to 144. hurray!!

I guess they chose the option of gating access to delve via sulphite scarabs which are pretty pricey rather than nerf delve loot.

"

demon9675 a écrit :

Can someone explain to me WHY it would be bad if we were able to run Delve more often? I'm not convinced the rewards are even that great, but if they are couldn't they just be reduced?

More sulphite, please. Let us play the content you spent a ton of $$$ on developing, please. Thanks.

Same reason GGG limits anything.
It would affect the econ because it generate orbs/maps without a currency sink - delves are technically free.

weird because I see the guy often when mapping..

"

xMustard a écrit :

yup i've given up on seeing niko until im ready to pay the entry fee of buying the scarabs.

funny thing is, i see the other masters plenty fine. hell i'll get times when i see zana in 50% of the maps i open, which is ridiculous.

also, if you open a zana map you can get masters and such. i've NEVER seen niko in a zana mission. even if its open on his daily map, niko will not be there. for the other masters however, it works just fine.

I see Zana really rarely. But since she is the most unrewarding master I'm glad to see others instead of her.

arnt maps free? I just alch and go, I find way more than 1 alch in every map, and its basically all I spend on them, maybe 1 map in 6 I use a chaos, I only use chisels I find.



I never trade for these currencies, theyre just dropping in maps faster than I can spend them on maps. Im fairly sure I have literally 1000s of red maps, over 100 guardian maps, pretty confident I could just run them all blue and the pool would keep growing, but why not alch them seeing as that is essentially free because Ill find at least 1 alch in that map right?


People are hitting level 100 in a matter of days in the new leagues, essentially 1 shotting guardians, what does any of it really matter any more? After the first week the new leagues are just standard league, the exalt rate is the same, all the serious grinders are high 90s/lvl100, the item saturation is a joke, mid tier uniques are all 1c each.

Gating content behind having to trade is cancer, people in leagues like standard where there isnt rampant trade, in the 2nd half of temp leagues where trade dries up, in solo self found modes etc etc etc need to have access to the content. People need to be able to play the game, trading in this game is diabolical, taking part in it on a daily basis constantly making sales which u need to do to maintain currency if ur buying ur way into content makes me want to smash my face in with a brick. I just want to play the game, and I want to do it self found or in standard, by myself or with a small group of friends.

Theyve balanced the drop rates of gear around ssf, the game is an utter joke if you trade, every incursion I run drops enough items to fully gear a character, its absurd. What does it really matter if people can just play content?

A single delve is what? About half a map? Maybe a bit less? Ok drop on average 0.5 alchs less per delve, and that will balance out the currency sink of alching ur map. Done. Now let us just log in and play the game.

I enjoy Delve and i do it every time my sulphite capacity reaches its limit (30.000). I haven't kept a log of Niko's spawn rate throughout my time spent mapping, but if i were to make a guess, i'd say i encounter Niko in one map out of ten, or one out of 15 maps, at least. There were a couple of occasions were i did encounter Niko on subsequent maps. Overall, Alva, Einhar and Zana spawn far more frequently while mapping.

I definitely wouldn't mind a higher spawn rate for Niko so i could Delve more often. I understand that Delve was never meant to replace the end game system of mapping, and it's silly to expect to delve as often. But, there's no excuse not to have his spawn rate be in line with the other masters.

Maps always produce more than they cost over the long run but people still find ways to complain.

The difference is that there is an RNG element to maps but no rng to delves. It costs nothing but imaginary suplhite where as you need to at least risk the resources to open and run a map.

GGG has one of two options, gate delves indirectly behind currency (scarabs), gate delves directly behind currency (buy suplhite with chaos orbs), or drastically nerf delve loot but make suplite plentify or free.

"

Nephalim a écrit :

"

demon9675 a écrit :

Can someone explain to me WHY it would be bad if we were able to run Delve more often? I'm not convinced the rewards are even that great, but if they are couldn't they just be reduced?

More sulphite, please. Let us play the content you spent a ton of $$$ on developing, please. Thanks.

Same reason GGG limits anything.
It would affect the econ because it generate orbs/maps without a currency sink - delves are technically free.

and there pretty good farming
https://www.twitch.tv/towerbrah/clip/ExpensiveAgreeableOtterPJSugar no real cost etc 20 mil exp ph at 99 in hcssf.