SSF Challenges

"

Mythabril a écrit :

SSF does not need catering to. It's an intentional choice to cripple yourself in order to add more difficulty to your game.

Every part of the game needs catering to, choice or not.

A "dedicated SFF challenge" or any sort of reward dedicated for SFF is bad with current "migration system", this can be abuse. I much rather GGG remove or atleast reduce the amount of RNG in the overall challenges in any mode. Challenges should be base on either mechanical skill, game knowledge or grind. that's why its called "challenges". It should not be just base on RNG that you can buy your way out of it.

"

Miathan51 a écrit :

I like the idea of SSF challenges. Perhaps not as a replacement of the normal ones though, but just as an extra. So, if you would complete 30 regular challenges and 10 SSF only ones, you'd show as 30/40 and 10/10, not 40/40. You could still get the 36 challenge reward though.

It would be something to give more meaning to SSF. I've not played SSF yet, but I totally would if there were some (reasonably obtainable) challenges attached.

There's already a meaning to SSF though.

For ppl like me who got tired of trading leagues and always get rich and / or bored to quickly.
The slower progression is great fun, and every drop feel meaningful.
And every time you find some t1 unique you'd start thinking of a new build you could roll with that.

Not to mention 6linking feels way more rewarding, i've done 3 so far this league and it feelt even better than what it does in trading league.

The reason SSF was even implemented in the first play was due a small minority wanted SSF ladders to compete. Prior to offical ladders, ppl helt unofficial ones. But it wasn't possible to keep ppl from cheating in that (Ie we would see in global trade "SSF_Totemguy: WTB xx" ) And they made fool out of themselfs.

Also doing all the challanges yourself is a challange in itself, and it feels fun and rewarding.
Having special challanges just because ssf is just not needed.
What that also would risk is, making more players go SSF to get those 10/10 then hop over to trading league like normal, and in turn that would possibly screw the trading market even more. (Due less ppl playing trading league initially)

But ye i don't realy understand ppl who wants special balancing for SSF. You go there fully knowing it'll be harder to progress, to finish challanges, to get gear and so on.

Sounds like you all want to be spoonfed.

"

Phrazz a écrit :

Every part of the game needs catering to, choice or not.

They already catered to people wanting a solo mode by doing SSF and giving it its own leaderboard.

I’m ok with the challenges the way they are. I just accept the fact that I probably won’t get the 2 socket lich or sextant challenge done without some RNG luck.

lol

Just make separate league challenges like before, give the same rewards who cares.

Softcore/Hardcore/Tradecore/SSF could all have seperate challenges or slightly different ones tailored to the mode.

Im not sure why they took away seperate league rewards in the first place besides not wanting people playing softcore to feel bad about having SC challenges on their forum account or having shitflinging going on in the forums about soft/hardcore. It was kinda fun making a SC build to get those challenges back in the day now I have no reason to even bother with it.