Spelling mistakes and typos

Apparently Fidelitas was renamed to "Fidelitis" - but only in the monster's name, not in Helena's dialogue.
Not-a-Cockroach
https://xkcd.com/1357/
The achievement Specialist misspells fourth as fouth
The text for the flameblast stacks is "Incinerate:" and garbled special characters:

Spoiler
When the Punishment curse is applied to the player, the text says:

"You are cursed. You are dealt a percentage of the phyisical damage you deal"


Physical is spelt incorrectly. Bug report # 332925019.

Cheers
Achievements "Specialist" Allocate a character's fouth Keystone Passive.

I'm pretty sure that "fouth" is supposed to be "fourth" :p

Spoiler
Fly you fools.
of Radiance 30 Light Radius +%
Accuracy Rating +% 15
5 to 10

^This is from the suffix page
I suspect it should say "50 to 100" instead of "5 to 10" about the accuracy bonus, else that would make it the worst suffix of this type, while it's the one with the highest required level.

Never mind, poster below me got it right, i completely missed the "%" symbol in that one.
Dernière édition par Dj0z#1340, le 4 janv. 2014 à 07:54:40
It's a percent-bonus, as opposed to the flat bonus of the lower tier affixes.
Mortal conviction (after the Blood Magic keystone) says "40% less Mana Reserved", it functions identically to all the reduced mana reserved passives.

This is either a bug or a typo.

I'm assuming the latter since there are serveral threads discusing the balance of it, and the devs would be well aware if it were not functioning as intended.
"
Spirit_of_Night a écrit :
Mortal conviction (after the Blood Magic keystone) says "40% less Mana Reserved", it functions identically to all the reduced mana reserved passives.
No, it doesn't. It stacks multiplicatively with them, not additively like a "reduced" modifier.

All "increased" and "reduced" modifiers to a value stack additively, while "more" and "less" modifiers stack multiplicatively.
Dernière édition par Mark_GGG#0000, le 14 janv. 2014 à 19:14:23
Having reviewed my maths, that is, indeed correct. I was merely mislead by assuming that "less" was the more powerful one, where it actually means purely that it is multiplicative. The real problem was I had assumed that reduced mana reserved and the reduced mana gem would work the same way, where actually they are multiplicative, because the support gem is a multiplier, irrespective of how the passives work.

Thank you for the clarification, and kicking me into actually working it out properly.

Sorry to waste your time.

Signaler

Compte à signaler :

Type de signalement

Infos supplémentaires