Iron ring @implicit value - WTF?
|
im amazed to see this hasnt been adressed to this day
Iron ring base IMPLICIT value regardles of item level 1-4phys dmg? CMON guys isnt it obvious that having Act1 campaign tier Implicit on an item makes it absolutely POINTLESS to even have in game> why not make it Tiered FFS ? - at least that way, ...... finding a high tir local implicit BASE IRON RING would be a whole another level of Melee potential Dernière édition par easthood#7411, le 27 janv. 2026 à 22:15:57 Dernier bump le 28 janv. 2026 à 14:22:44
|
|
|
Im not against reevaluating the implicit, but this wouldn't give melee an edge over ranged attack builds whatsoever.
|
|
" saving the druid (wolf). other melee toons are slow, weak, and horrible on single target. if they do it, for example: iron ring level 81-82, with implicit 12-18, it will not change any thing. ranger will always do more damage (per second), because it is range. Dernière édition par KaiserBlade42#7840, le 27 janv. 2026 à 23:51:38
|
|
|
ill take 12-18 implicit anyday,
paired with T1 phys prefix is actually already worth considering over resistance .....current 1-4 is just pathetic waste of an item Dernière édition par easthood#7411, le 28 janv. 2026 à 03:27:54
|
|
|
The genius idea from the same devs that thought level 82 bosses should drop regal shards
|
|
|
quote;
saving the druid (wolf). other melee toons are slow, weak, and horrible on single target OKAy, increasing Implicit value was just a FIRST STEP towards grand skeem of things Iron ring - WTF If you wish to adjust t that statement Iron Ringnow grants ONSLAUGHT on kill could be ovrpowered but STILL in the phusical realm at this point in 4 seasons - its obvious to say GGG needs to revise early items |
|
