Omen of Catalysing Exaltation
![]() I used chaos quality, to aim chaos resistance. It removed all quality, but somehow didnt use omen? and i got mana regenaration. Is this intented interaction? Dernière édition par ekader1#7483, le 4 sept. 2025 à 11:25:24 Dernier bump le 29 déc. 2025 à 16:44:44
|
|
|
Looking at the Omen, it says "to increase the chance of", not "to guarantee".
Sounds like it was just bad luck. |
|
" The problem is, it consumes the extra quality but omen stays untouched in my inventory though. I am not even sure, it interacted with "increased chance to get corresponding quality type. But thank you, i know the difference between increased chance versus guarenteed Does it only consume when it successfully add corresponding type then? Dernière édition par ekader1#7483, le 4 sept. 2025 à 11:30:31
|
|
|
Does anyone have some experience on using this omen?
|
|
" Yes, all attempts at using it were absolutely trash. ex just now: Breach ring with flat fire, flat lightning (recombined, no other mods). Spend ~1 div pumping the fire to 40%. Catalyzing exalt a suffix and... I get mana regen + light radius. Mana regen + light radius has nothing to do with fire, the only suffixes that have a fire mod type are all res and fire resist. So if 1 div doesn't get me a guaranteed result the omen is effectively worthless. I would be better off starting out with 10 blue breach rings, exalt slamming them all blindly, and taking the "winners" to the well of souls to look for their last good mod. Dernière édition par xayd#4454, le 29 déc. 2025 à 16:00:50
| |
|
My SSF experience is that it has never hit the mod i used quality for, around 10 or so attempts with maxed/lower amounts of qual. I just ignore that omen for the most part how horrible it is to try hit anything you actually need, in my case being cast speed. Low weight sure, but you'd think you could hit at least a shit tier with a regular exalt.
Why it didn't use up the omen is beyond me. Are you sure you didn't have a 2 stack of the omens? Dernière édition par azuz22#0654, le 29 déc. 2025 à 16:51:58
|
|

















